哀牢山自然保护区南华片黑颈长尾雉繁殖早期取食地选择

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

曹明,李伟,周伟,张兴勇,张仁功

文章导航> 浙江农林大学学报> 2007> 24(2): 203-208

曹明, 李伟, 周伟, 等. 哀牢山自然保护区南华片黑颈长尾雉繁殖早期取食地选择[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(2): 203-208.

引用本文:

曹明, 李伟, 周伟, 等. 哀牢山自然保护区南华片黑颈长尾雉繁殖早期取食地选择[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(2): 203-208.

CAOMing, LI Wei, ZHOUWei, et al. Foraging sites during the early breeding stage of Syrmaticus humiae in the Nanhua Part of Ailaoshan National Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(2): 203-208.

Citation:

CAOMing, LI Wei, ZHOUWei,et al. Foraging sites during the early breeding stage ofSyrmaticus humiaein the Nanhua Part of Ailaoshan National Nature Reserve[J].Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(2): 203-208.

哀牢山自然保护区南华片黑颈长尾雉繁殖早期取食地选择

曹明¹,
李伟¹,
周伟^1,,,
张兴勇¹,
张仁功²

1.
西南林学院保护生物学学院,云南昆明650224;
2.
云南省楚雄州自然保护区管理局,云南楚雄67500

基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2003CB415100);西南林学院大学生科技创新基金资助项目

详细信息

作者简介:曹明,硕士研究生,从事动物生态学研究。

通信作者:周伟,教授,博士,从事生物多样性保护、动物生态学、脊椎动物区系和分类等研究。

中图分类号:Q958.12; S718.6

Foraging sites during the early breeding stage ofSyrmaticus humiaein the Nanhua Part of Ailaoshan National Nature Reserve

1.
Faculty of Conservation Biology, Southwest Forestry College, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China;
2.
Nature Reserve Management Bureau of Chuxiong Prefecture, Chuxiong 675000, Yunnan, China

Funds:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2003CB415100);西南林学院大学生科技创新基金资助项目

摘要:黑颈长尾雉Syrmaticus humiae取食地的观察于2005年3月11日至4月16日在云南哀牢山国家级自然保护区南华片进行,搜寻到取食地15个,相应设15个对照样地。调查和测量它们的22个变量因子。比较取食地与对照样地中各变量, t-检验和Mann-Whitney U-检验结果表明,植被特征的乔木密度、灌木密度、灌木层盖度、草本层盖度和枯落物盖度等5个变量因子差异极显著,乔木层盖度差异显著;食物因素的种子密度和土壤动物密度2个因子差异极显著。主成分分析结果显示,黑颈长尾雉优先选择的取食地具有以下特征:灌木、乔木、草本和枯落物层发达,地面种子食物资源丰富,远离干扰源。黑颈长尾雉围绕解决繁殖期取食安全和营养需求来优先选择取食地变量因子,即选择互补型的高灌木或乔木盖度、壳斗科Fagaceae植物种子和土壤无脊椎动物丰富的区域作为取食地。表3参26
- 动物学/
- 黑颈长尾雉/
- 取食地选择/
- 繁殖早期/
- 哀牢山
Abstract:Humes pheasant(Syrmaticus humiae)is an easy to endangered species. The object is to effectively protectHumes pheasant in its breeding season. Foraging sites ofHumes pheasantwere surveyed fromMarch 11 to April 16,2005.Fifteen foraging plotswere established alongwith the same numberof control plots and 22 variables were measured. A t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test to compare variables in forage and control plots showed significant differences(P 0.01) for the five vegetation characteristics of tree density, shrub density, shrub coverage, herbage coverage, and leaf litter coverage; crown canopy was also significantly different(P 0.05).Additionally, significant differences(P 0.01)for two food characteristics, namely seed density and density of edaphic animals, were noted. A principal component analysis indicated that fine shrub, tree, herb, andlitter layers;abundantseed resources in the understory;and being faraway fromhuman disturbance characterized optimal foraging sites forHumes pheasant.Thus,when selecting a foraging site in the breeding season,safety and nutrition were the pheasantsmajor concerns. Therefore, they would choose foraging habitats with strong camouflage cover from shrubs or treeswith ample food sources in the understory, such as seeds from the Fagaceae family and edaphic animals.[Ch, 3 tab. 26 ref.]
- zoology/
- Syrmaticus humiae/
- forage site selection/
- early breeding stage/
- Ailaoshan

[1]	王成, 董斌, 彭文娟, 陈凌娜, 黄慧, 叶小康, 朱鸣, 吕典, 倪燕华, 赵抗抗, 张双双.升金湖湿地土地利用对鹤类栖息地及种群数量的影响. 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(3): 511-518.doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.03.016
[2]	杨晓兰, 巩合德.滇西北小型啮齿动物对不同植物种子的捕食差异调查. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(3): 440-445.doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.03.017
[3]	郑方东, 包其敏, 林莉斯, 章书声, 刘西.地松鼠亚科的起源与演化研究进展. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(5): 797-802.doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.05.021
[4]	巩合德, 燕腾, 彭一航, 郑丽, 马月伟.哀牢山多花山矾幼苗在森林及模拟森林光环境条件下的生长特征. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(2): 237-243.doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.02.010
[5]	郑艳霞.官山国家级自然保护区白颈长尾雉冬季生境选择. 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(1): 89-96.doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.01.014
[6]	徐文辉, 岳晓雷, 高鹏, 夏淑娟.天目山国家级自然保护区黑麂潜在栖息地的生态适宜性. 浙江农林大学学报, 2013, 30(6): 896-903.doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.06.014
[7]	余运威, 应叶青, 任丽萍, 胡加付, 赵阿勇.浙江临安竹林土壤动物群落结构特征及多样性. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(4): 581-587.doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.04.015
[8]	朱曦, 曹炜斌, 王军.舟山普陀山岛兽类区系及分布. 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(1): 110-115.doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.01.018
[9]	朱曦, 王青良, 詹印波, 韩甫, 蒋洪赟, 周雯, 何于波.浙江普陀山岛两栖爬行动物区系及分布. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(5): 708-713.
[10]	李宁, 周伟, 杨雁瑛, 张庆, 刘钊.云南大中山黑颈长尾雉冬季植物性食物显微分析. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(3): 363-367.
[11]	朱桂寿, 丁良冬, 俞根连, 周晓丽.浙江省野生动物驯养繁殖业现状分析. 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(1): 109-113.
[12]	邵继峰, 鲁庆彬, 金晶, 游卫云, 于江傲.清凉峰环颈雉冬季觅食地选择. 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(4): 507-512.
[13]	张纵, 梁南南, 郭玉东, 赵军.鸟类保护的城市园林多样性途径探析. 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(4): 511-515.
[14]	朱曦, 徐昱, 葛映川, 陈中意, 李春耀.浙江龙王山自然保护区鸟类区系. 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(1): 77-85.
[15]	胡忠军, 王淯, 薛文杰, 姜海瑞, 徐宏发.陕西紫柏山自然保护区林麝种群密度. 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(1): 65-71.
[16]	邝粉良, 刘宁, 仓决卓玛, 李建川, 杨乐, 李福秀.藏北黑颈鹤繁殖前期的昼间活动时间分配. 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(6): 686-691.
[17]	潘世秀, 孟秀祥, 冯金朝, 周宜君, 徐宏发.小型林间独栖反刍动物栖息地选择研究进展. 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(3): 357-362.
[18]	严少君, 朱曦, 俞益武.华中区城市型鹭鸟栖息地营建技术. 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(6): 697-700.
[19]	贺佳飞, 周伟, 李明会.多疣狭口蛙繁殖生态初步观察. 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(3): 311-315.
[20]	李伟, 周伟, 纪德, 张仁功.哀牢山自然保护区南华分区黑颈长尾雉春季栖息地利用. 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(2): 153-158.

链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/id/1263
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2007/2/203

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:1665
HTML全文浏览量:323
PDF下载量:142
被引次数:0

哀牢山自然保护区南华片黑颈长尾雉繁殖早期取食地选择

1. 西南林学院保护生物学学院,云南昆明650224;
2. 云南省楚雄州自然保护区管理局,云南楚雄67500

基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2003CB415100);西南林学院大学生科技创新基金资助项目

作者简介:
曹明,硕士研究生,从事动物生态学研究。

通信作者:周伟,教授,博士,从事生物多样性保护、动物生态学、脊椎动物区系和分类等研究。

收稿日期: 2006-08-06
修回日期:2006-11-21
刊出日期: 2007-04-20

中图分类号:Q958.12; S718.6

关键词:

摘要:黑颈长尾雉Syrmaticus humiae取食地的观察于2005年3月11日至4月16日在云南哀牢山国家级自然保护区南华片进行,搜寻到取食地15个,相应设15个对照样地。调查和测量它们的22个变量因子。比较取食地与对照样地中各变量, t-检验和Mann-Whitney U-检验结果表明,植被特征的乔木密度、灌木密度、灌木层盖度、草本层盖度和枯落物盖度等5个变量因子差异极显著,乔木层盖度差异显著;食物因素的种子密度和土壤动物密度2个因子差异极显著。主成分分析结果显示,黑颈长尾雉优先选择的取食地具有以下特征:灌木、乔木、草本和枯落物层发达,地面种子食物资源丰富,远离干扰源。黑颈长尾雉围绕解决繁殖期取食安全和营养需求来优先选择取食地变量因子,即选择互补型的高灌木或乔木盖度、壳斗科Fagaceae植物种子和土壤无脊椎动物丰富的区域作为取食地。表3参26

English Abstract

Foraging sites during the early breeding stage ofSyrmaticus humiaein the Nanhua Part of Ailaoshan National Nature Reserve

1. Faculty of Conservation Biology, Southwest Forestry College, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China;
2. Nature Reserve Management Bureau of Chuxiong Prefecture, Chuxiong 675000, Yunnan, China

Funds:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2003CB415100);西南林学院大学生科技创新基金资助项目

Received Date:2006-08-06
Rev Recd Date:2006-11-21
Publish Date:2007-04-20

Keywords:

Abstract:Humes pheasant(Syrmaticus humiae)is an easy to endangered species. The object is to effectively protectHumes pheasant in its breeding season. Foraging sites ofHumes pheasantwere surveyed fromMarch 11 to April 16,2005.Fifteen foraging plotswere established alongwith the same numberof control plots and 22 variables were measured. A t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test to compare variables in forage and control plots showed significant differences(P 0.01) for the five vegetation characteristics of tree density, shrub density, shrub coverage, herbage coverage, and leaf litter coverage; crown canopy was also significantly different(P 0.05).Additionally, significant differences(P 0.01)for two food characteristics, namely seed density and density of edaphic animals, were noted. A principal component analysis indicated that fine shrub, tree, herb, andlitter layers;abundantseed resources in the understory;and being faraway fromhuman disturbance characterized optimal foraging sites forHumes pheasant.Thus,when selecting a foraging site in the breeding season,safety and nutrition were the pheasantsmajor concerns. Therefore, they would choose foraging habitats with strong camouflage cover from shrubs or treeswith ample food sources in the understory, such as seeds from the Fagaceae family and edaphic animals.[Ch, 3 tab. 26 ref.]

曹明, 李伟, 周伟, 等. 哀牢山自然保护区南华片黑颈长尾雉繁殖早期取食地选择[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(2): 203-208.

引用本文:

曹明, 李伟, 周伟, 等. 哀牢山自然保护区南华片黑颈长尾雉繁殖早期取食地选择[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(2): 203-208.

Citation: